Over the last three years, I have had a pretty heated debate on whether Property Unit Trusts (PUTs) are a better alternative for people looking to get into the property market than trying to buy property and 'flipping' them or using the rental income to pay off the bonds.
With the property market flying in the last few years, my views on PUT's have been shouted down. People have pointed out that they want 'real' investments where they can see the bricks and mortar.
Ja well no fine...
Now that the banks have tightened their lending regulations, PUTs have to be considered a real first option for getting into the property market. Consider this - if you want to buy an entry level property of R400 000 (REAL entry level) you need R40 000 - R80 000 in cash to put down as a deposit (assuming you don't do the 'personal loan' thing).
Not a lot of people trying to enter the market have that kind of cash available.
On a R400k bond you would be paying R 5469.72 on you your first property.... hhhmmm thinking back to my first property - that's a pretty tough pill to swallow.
(Especially if you are not deriving any rental income off it).
Now if you could take half that figure of R 5469.72 and were to invest it into the likes of Growthpoint or ApexHi - (Highly regarded property unit trusts listed on the JSE), you could buy access to properties like these featured in this blog. The pictures are of Constantia Park in Roodepoort and Fredman Towers in Sandton which form part of the Growthpoint portfolio.
No need to change light bulbs, fix toilets, fight with tenants for rent or have to do any of the credit checking - a professional team is managing it for you AND you pick up an after tax yield of around 6 - 8%.
Bear in mind that the biggest problem with 'buy-to-let' strategy is that many many players are buying on geared portfolios. Every month, they are paying a big chunk of their installment or rental income to service debt.
If investors are going to put money into a property portfolio, the PUT route may be a better starting point than extending themselves to buy property they can't afford.
Just a very quick sum to prove my point. If I take that montly installment of R 5469.72 over two years (24 months) I would have paid in R131273. The reality is that you would hardly paid off any of the capital amount after two years of paying in.
At the same time you'll be paying in say R1000 a month in water, rates, elec etc. so that figure increases to R155273. So basically your first R150k has returned nothing to you.
At the same time if I had invested that R 5469.72 into one of the PUTs I would have been cash positive to the tune of around R8000 at the same period (plus probably some capital gain in the units themselves...)
Might be something to bear in mind before young property investors go out there and over extend themselves?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
The other nice thing that I like about PUTs is that you have a transparency around what the market is prepared to pay for your asset.
I suspect somebody is going to come back and point to their house price doubling in two years etc, but the price hasn't really 'doubled' unless you actually sell the house...
I know of at least two houses where the estate agent told me "Its value has doubled in the last three years" (they were asking R1.5m at their first show day three months ago but are now considering offers of R950 000 and upwards)
I know at any given time what the market is prepared to pay for my PUTs' - do you know what the market is prepared to pay for your house?
For me the pivotal issue isn't around the entry difficulties, but rather which is expected to deliver a higher return. With shares dirt cheap at the moment, why invest in property at all?
I suppose that "Cheap" is hard to define - I thought Impala Platinum looked cheap at R180 a share and its now at R130.
PUT's simply provide people with an ungeared access to the property market that should generate a cash positive return...
PUT's are definitely an investment to consider, but it is not for me at the moment. If I have additional cash that I don't know what to do with, I will park it there. Armchair investor like. :)
I like to invest in property actively. So I go and look for properties that are below market value to hold or flip.
If you take R100k and invest R50k in PUT's and R50k in some property investment, like buy to flip. I wonder which will make the most money? I think buy to flip.
I have bought property and sold the next day for R25k profit without using any money and selling it to the next person using a tripartait agreement. I don't think PUT's can beat that. :)
But there are many ways to invest in property, and you need to choose the method you like best.
Happy property hunting!
Hi Colin
Thanks for the posting...
The property flipping is great - provided you're not borrowing to buy the asset.
The moment you start flipping using a banks money (If they'd be kind enough to lend it to you), then you're headed backwards
Post a Comment